Lisa T. Miller is back in court again trying to revive a lawsuit that a federal judge already tossed once. But no matter how she rewrites her complaint, the facts haven’t changed. Here’s why this second attempt to silence us through legal pressure is just as flawed as the first.
See the new case file here
She Already Got Her Money Back
Lisa paid $10,000 to join our AYG Certification Program, then filed multiple PayPal disputes over several months. Eventually, PayPal ruled in her favor, and she got 100% of her money back. Not a partial refund. Not a credit. The full amount. And yet, she kept all the program materials, templates, access, and training. In most cases, that would be the end of it. But not for Lisa.
She Chose Not to Participate Then Blamed Us
Our team made every effort to support her. We setup her Basecamp access within 24 hours, sent her leads, gave her access to private masterminds, offered speaking opportunities, provided weekly live Office Hours She declined to participate in almost all of it. She ignored Office Hours. She didn’t complete assignments. She messaged our team sporadically while demanding 1-on-1 attention, then complained when others who followed the process were succeeding.
The Judge Already Threw Her Lawsuit Out
In April 2025, a federal judge dismissed Lisa’s original complaint, citing it as a “shotgun pleading” with vague and unsupported claims. The judge said it failed to explain that either defendant did wrong. She was given one last chance to refile. Now she’s trying again with an amended complaint but the underlying facts are unchanged.
Her Own Filing Shows the Holes
In her amended complaint, Lisa showed Zelle and Venmo receipts but those payments were already refunded – Claims she didn’t receive value yet still uses the website templates we built, she paints herself as a victim while threatening legal action, YouTube privacy complaints, DMCA takedowns, and sending vaguely menacing messages to our team If she truly believed she was wronged, why resort to takedown threats and personal attacks rather than a clear, provable case?
She Quietly Dropped Her Case Against Parker Nathans
Lisa sued Parker Nathans alongside me in her original complaint. But a few weeks later, she filed a voluntary dismissal with prejudice against him, which means she can never sue him again for the same issue. She settled with him privately and removed him from the case. That says everything.
Her Reputation Tactics Are Transparent
Lisa has been buying PR and SEO backlinks to inflate her credibility. Filing YouTube privacy complaints to suppress videos that mention her name. Attempting to pressure us into silence through legal fees and social shaming. We’re not backing down. We stand by our team, our documentation, and our integrity. We’ve shared everything publicly so others can see the pattern.
Read More:
How Lisa T. Miller Took $10,000 From Our Team
Lisa T. Miller’s DMCA and YouTube Takedown Attempts
Why We Refused to Be Bullied Into Silence
If you’re considering working with Lisa T. Miller, or following her leadership in the healthcare or agency world, we strongly recommend you review the full public record. having money doesn’t make someone right. And lawsuits don’t erase the truth.
